Maurice
A. Barboza
1985
One day
a quarter of a century ago, I waited uneasily for my 9th grade
American history teacher to ask us to turn to the next chapter.
Whether they were or not, I felt my white classmates' eyes
staring at me. My forehead was damp; my stomach on the verge
of erupting. I heard my teacher's voice then the sound of
rustling paper that in my head I imagined to be my classmates'
giggling.
I had
sensed from my first few days in elementary school that those
kids thought my skin color was a sure sign of my inferiority.
They saw television; they heard the news. They knew about
southern segregation of the races. They understood, even in
the North, where they wrongly thought slavery had never existed,
that America had willed them a superior status to those with
a brownish tint to their skin.
The next
30 pages of text would begin a painful two week study of the
civil war and slavery. The study of colonial and Revolutionary
era America, since as far as those 1950s textbook writers,
blacks didn't even exist, except as shadows across hidden
references to slaves and slave owners.
But with
the civil war and post civil war period, came photography
and the emancipation of thousands of slaves that history could
not ignore. Nor could it find a way to acknowledge their meaning,
contributions, manhood and womanhood, and central part in
the long train of forgotten history that led to the freedoms
we all exercise as a result of their struggle.
The pictures
and illustrations of slave shacks and poor, disheveled black
people made me nervous, ashamed and embarrassed. My white
classmates, who saw few if any blacks in our small Connecticut
town, could only be amused, I thought. These were people they
would surely see as my ancestors -- the progenitors of my
family. Their "ancestors" were the masters -- the
founding fathers, the Signers of the Declaration of Independence,
the Northern shopkeepers and ship captains, the Southern landowners
whose domains stretched for miles. Slaves the color of my
skin did their bidding -- their dirty work.
It didn't
matter that most of their own ancestors hadn't arrived in
America until decades after the Civil War. Their white skin
automatically entitled them to the bounty of American history
that only made me feel inferior -- less entitled. Those my
color were slaves and servants whose only value was in the
status their numbers gave to their owner.
I wanted
to tear out the pages from the books because they confirmed
what those children thought blacks were like. Television,
radio and the movies of the late 1950's portrayed us as comical,
dumb and lazy. Because of the color of my skin, they expected
me to behave this way.
Nothing
we read in the next few days or three years told us that blacks
had served in the American Revolution or built institutions
to combat slavery and racism before the turn of the 19th century.
There were no hints that free black persons existed before
the emancipation proclamation or that thousands of blacks
had fought in the civil war.
The only
glimmer was that this white history teacher did her best to
balance those negative images. She must have seen something
of value in what was missing from the textbooks she was obliged
to use. Over the years, she had collected newspaper and magazine
articles about contemporary blacks who were doing inspiring
things. She talked about Paul Robeson's genius and Althea
Gibson's accomplishments. I even recall her regaling the eloquence
of Sojourner Truth and the bravery of Harriet Tubman. But
why weren't these people either in the history books or their
deeds more prominently featured?
We were
too young and inexperienced to see the strength and character
etched in the faces of the slaves pictured in our books or
to comprehend how extraordinarily resilient and resourceful
a person -- indeed an entire race -- had to be in order to
survive a life unfit for animals.
Americans
my age and older, were taught half a history lesson that was
calculated to make white children chauvinistic and intellectually
sharp and black children reflections of a stereotypical image
created by historians and Hollywood and perpetuated by teachers.
School molded white children for successful careers and black
children for servitude.
From kindergarten
to junior high, I lived in emotional and social isolation
from most of my classmates. I was ostracized because I wouldn't
behave the way they expected a black child to behave. Teachers
saw me as a nonconformist.
The self
doubts and recurring questions about who, and what, I was
plagued my academic performance to a point where one rare,
sensitive teacher, who would return an "A" paper
one week and a "C" paper the next, was prompted
to ask why I punished myself. "Don't think to much,"
she would say, "just do."
Had text
books been integrated in the 1950s, positive black images
would have made me feel confident, boosted my sense of belonging
and improved my grades. This environment would have been fertile
ground for my white school mates and me to develop the kinds
of relationships that they formed effortlessly among themselves.
With age
and maturity, my classmates began slowly to discern the shape
of my character and ceased to see me as a black reflection
of their racial biases. They must have recognized on their
own that what society was telling them about black people
was not true. The ignorance that separated us was replaced
by understanding. We began to enjoy being together and formed
bonds of affection and friendship that have survived two decades.
However,
I doubt that my classmates were able to jettison enough of
their racial prejudices to keep them from creeping into their
children's thinking. Many of them probably still believe that
history was made by whites exclusively, as we were taught.
No doubt they admire the courage of the great black leaders
of the civil rights revolution and see the justness of their
cause. But do they know that that movement was ignited 10
generations before any contemporary civil rights leader was
born by black men and women -- slaves and free persons --
who looked like the ones they once laughed at and I was ashamed
of?
Years
after I left my hometown, I was stalked by an urge to know
more about my immigrant and multiracial background. Through
genealogical research, I found that my family was a tapestry
of races and colors that dated back to colonial America. A
black and a white great great grandfather had served in the
civil war and three white ancestors were involved in the Revolution.
I thought
if Americans, like my former school mates, knew something
of this history, it would help them overcome some of the lingering
prejudice they may feel. Blacks have an obligation to push
the civil rights movement not just through the streets and
board rooms, but also through the minds of white America.
My aunt, Lena Santos Ferguson, and I tried to do this in a
small way by applying for membership in the Daughters of the
American Revolution and the Sons of the American Revolution.
We wanted to demonstrate America's multiracial diversity and
honor the memory of the 5,000 blacks who served in the American
Revolution.
Lena's
efforts to become a DAR member, stymied because of her race
for four years, led us to urge Congress to pass a joint resolution
honoring black patriots. Public Law 98-245, which calls for
commemorative activity this February, passed unanimously and
was signed by the President. Now we are initiating an effort
to obtain Congressional authorization to construct a memorial
in Washington to honor black Revolutionary War soldiers and
the many more black men and women who contributed to independence
or sought personal freedom during the Revolutionary period.
The eve
of the bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution is a fitting
time for the nation to honor these forgotten patriots for
what they did to help win American independence and to inspire
the civil rights activities of recent decades. This will contribute
to a better understanding between Americans of all races and
give blacks a concrete reason to join in the 1987 commemorative
ceremonies and to exhibit an exciting new sense of patriotism.